Comparison

Teen Patti vs Andar Bahar◈

Same deck, same country, same table. One asks you to decide things repeatedly; the other asks once and then deals.

Side by side

The one-decision problem

In Andar Bahar you pick a side, a card is turned up, and cards are dealt alternately until one pile matches its rank. That is the entire game.

Nothing between the shuffle and the result involves a person. The outcome was fixed when the deck was shuffled; the dealing just reveals it slowly.

Teen Patti is the opposite. The cards are fixed too — you cannot improve three cards — but how much you spend on them — Teen Patti is entirely yours, and that is where the game lives.

Which is actually harder to play well

Andar Bahar cannot be played well or badly. There is no such thing as a good Andar Bahar player, which is not a criticism — the game does not claim otherwise.

Teen Patti can be played badly in several ways: paying to see cards you should have folded, calling with a pair when the betting says someone has a sequence, or missing that the Teen Patti hands ranking puts a sequence above a colour.

When each one fits

• A minute between other things — Andar Bahar.
• An evening with friends — Teen Patti. The betting is what people talk about afterwards.
• Teaching someone who has never played cards — Andar Bahar first, because the concept of a table and a deal lands in thirty seconds.

Common questions

Keep reading